friendsofthedart.org ↗Log in
Why it keeps happening

Treatment works capacity

Every overflow goes to a sewage treatment works that serves a fixed area. There is no public data available to understand if the works has sufficient capacity to treat the sewage for the local population. We estimate this capacity based on the required capacity in the EA permit compared to the local population estimated to be on the sewage system. As we receive data on the actual processing capacity from South West Water we will add that too.

Capacity across the River Dart

4 of the 12 works we track are estimated to take more flow than their permit allows — between them they serve about 2,462 people. We are waiting to receive permits for 3 works and hence cannot yet assess their capacity.

4
Over their permitted flow
estimated load above the permit
4
Have headroom but spill anyway
points to another problem
3
Cannot be assessed
no permit received yet
2,462
People on an over-loaded works
served by works over or at the limit
Works
Load against permit
Overflow at works
Spare capacity
Widecombe STW
519 people · 16 m³/day permitted
454%
Over capacity
19 h
1 upstream · 17 pre-STW
None
at or over its permit
Scorriton STW
293 people · 25 m³/day permitted
164%
Over capacity
1,833 h
0 upstream
None
at or over its permit
Harberton STW
1,357 people · 150 m³/day permitted
127%
Over capacity
1,829 h
0 upstream
None
at or over its permit
Holne STW
293 people · 36.4 m³/day permitted
113%
Over capacity
1,400 h
0 upstream
None
at or over its permit
Broadhempston STW
500 people · 75 m³/day permitted
93%
Within capacity
1,039 h
0 upstream
~40
more people it could serve
Dittisham Main STW
388 people · 66 m³/day permitted
82%
Within capacity
205 h
2 upstream · 533 pre-STW
~80
more people it could serve
Totnes STW
10,392 people · 3,967 m³/day permitted
37%
Within capacity
593 h
12 upstream · 1,033 pre-STW
~17,900
more people it could serve
Ashprington STW
446 people · 181 m³/day permitted
34%
Within capacity
25 h
0 upstream
~850
more people it could serve
Princetown STW
1,443 people · 1,023 m³/day permitted
20%
Within capacity
0 h
1 upstream · 18 pre-STW
~5,900
more people it could serve
Buckfastleigh STW
7,795 people · permit not found
Not known
Not assessed
2,187 h
5 upstream · 260 pre-STW
Not known
Rattery STW
580 people · permit not found
Not known
Not assessed
1,712 h
0 upstream
Not known
Strete STW
population unknown · 122 m³/day permitted
Not known
Not assessed
0 h
0 upstream
Not known

The black line marks 100% of permitted dry-weather flow; a dashed empty bar means no permit was found to measure against. Load is an estimate — population served × per-head water use, plus infiltration — not a permit-compliance finding. A works over 100% here is a signal to investigate, not a proven breach. Overflow hours are the works' own storm overflow in the last full year.

3 works awaiting a permit

We are still waiting to receive permits for Buckfastleigh STW, Rattery STW, Strete STW, so we cannot yet check whether they are big enough for the population they serve. This is a gap in the public record — not a clean bill of health — and it is the quickest thing on this page to fix: the permitted flow is public information a water company must supply on request.

Why this matters for reading spills

Works over capacity

If a works cannot treat the flow it receives, it spills to protect itself. The remedy is capital investment or a lower permitted load — years and millions, but it is the water company's to fix.

Headroom, but still spills

A works with spare capacity whose network still spills points to another problem — often something on that branch, like a blockage, a failed pump, or groundwater getting into the sewer. Frequently cheap to fix, and fixable now.

No permit found

Where we cannot find the permitted flow, the works cannot be assessed at all. That is a gap in the public record, and closing it is the first step to holding capacity to account.

How growth becomes spills

A developer has a section 106 right to connect to the public sewer, and the water company has a section 94 duty to accept the flow — but capacity is only funded on a five-yearly capital cycle. New connections can therefore arrive years before the works is enlarged to take them, and the overflow absorbs the gap. Schedule 3 to the Flood and Water Management Act 2010, which would make sustainable drainage mandatory and give a SuDS Approving Body a say, has been in force in Wales since 2018 but remains uncommenced in England — so here there is no such body.

What the permit actually sets

The permitted dry-weather flow is set by Formula A — roughly DWF + 1,360 × population + 2 × trade effluent (litres/day). The permit also sets a flow to full treatment, typically about three times DWF, below which everything must be treated rather than spilled. Our load figure compares estimated demand against that permitted DWF. 2 works in the catchment publish no permitted flow at all, so their load cannot be calculated — they show as not assessed, never 0%.